Usage of ornaments and traditional aspects vs. Simplicity and no Essay

Usage of ornaments and traditional aspects vs. Simplicity and no ornaments - Essay exercisingGrowing urban areas, especially in the rapidly developing cities, have become arenas of many remote forces associated with the growing of commercialism and consumption attitudes, architectural fashions and professional egoism, and many misconceptions regarding progress and modernization. Essentially, there is a crocked discourse between building of simple and minimalist structures and doing away with the traditional aspects of computer architecture that lay furiousness on nonfunctional prowess. The big question is whether architecture, in its modern or traditional form, stands in capital of New Hampshire with the culture and environment (Trilling, 2001). Cities have thence become a symbol for the neglect of organic, cultural traditions and the desolation of the identity of places. Respect of traditions and factors specific to certain places is, however, of highest importance for a s ymbiotic development of the human environment relationship. As individual characteristics are different so it should be with cities, with urban planning. In the modern world, architecture has changed the values that it portrays. It reflects different set of values from the traditional local ones buildings and space are symbols for economic and governmental power, importance and status, achievement and wealth, ours and theirs, poor and rich. The prerequisites are visibility and surprise the creation of a distinct go steady in the observers mind for capturing his attention.... It is evident that ornamental architecture added to the visual appeal of architectural intents and also helped make people to easily relate to the buildings around them. However, the advent of modern architecture in the 1920s spelt death for the once popular ornamental architecture. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, it has been normal to take that good design has to be plain and simple. Ornamenta tion was renounced because proponents of modern architecture believed that the decorative aspects of design were inessential and not cost effective (Loos, 1998) . The origins of modern architecture can be attributed to the social and political revolutions of that time. Advances in technology and engineering gave rise to new materials such as iron and steel which encourage minimalist design. The advent in modern architecture has given prominence to the concept of internationalization. In this regard, the design of buildings has become uniform regardless of the cultural background. This is evident considering that it has become a norm to have just about generic high rise block buildings in almost every city in the world. This paper seeks to analyze make a comparison between two architects. This is in respect to the traditional ornamental architecture and the modern non ornamental simple architectural design. It should be noted that architecture is an evolving discipline and thus mo dernity was bound to happen. However, the major issue is to evaluate the impacts of modern architecture and the how recent advances in architecture have shaped the society. The implications of discarding traditional ornamental architecture will also be evaluated. This is essential to task the overall impact of